In my previous life for 7 or 8
years I was an auditor. An auditor is
usually a CPA who reviews and verifies accounting records for public, private
or governmental agencies.
I’ve had a the opportunity to
review the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report that was presented to the
Mayor, City Manager, and Council at the last Council meeting on April 1st
. I found what seems to be a glaring and
possibly material error in the way litigation is reserved and footnoted.
One would think that pending
litigation would be material if the ultimate cost to the Village of Palmetto
Bay was, say, a million dollars, but somehow the firm auditing the Village of
Palmetto Bay did not find or may not have been given accurate information regarding
pending litigation between Palmer and the Village, and pending litigation
between Shores of Palmetto Bay and Palmetto Bay.
The direct quote by the auditor
in the Report under the heading Litigation is :
“The Village is involved in several lawsuits incidental to its
operations, the outcome of which, in the opinion of management and legal
counsel, should not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of
the Village.”
I’m sure everyone is thinking, we
know there is litigation occurring between Palmer Trinity and the Village, and
Shores of Palmetto Bay and the Village, so what is the issue?
The issue is that Audits and
auditors have guidelines to follow. These
guidelines may be foreign to the lay person but are important because they
require litigation to be handled in a specific manner on an Audited Financial
Statement. (Not to get too technical, but the wonks among you might agree that public
and government audits as they relate to litigation contingences must follow
SFAS No. 5, GASB No. 62 and GASB No. 10.)
So what if guidelines weren’t
followed and the financials are misstated - then what? The Mayor and the Council should demand to find
out why. First, was it the auditing firm
that made the error? Was it the Village
Manager or Finance Director? Was it the
Village Attorney? The auditing firm, Cherry
Berkaert, is only responsible for the information that is presented to them by
various sources within the Village during the Audit. That’s why all Auditors require a
Representation Letter to be signed by the Auditee, in this case, the Village of
Palmetto Bay. Note that the auditor makes the determination that litigation is
not material based on the opinion of management and legal counsel
The Auditors are required to send
out what is called an Attorney Confirmation to all law firms who have been paid
during the year to find out what type of litigation is occurring in the Village
and what effect it may have on the Finances of the Village. In this case, I would hope that our Village
Attorney Eve Boutsis received and sent one back. If not the auditing firm has some, as Ricky
Ricardo once said to Lucy, some serious “esplaining to do”.
With millions of dollars at stake
should this information been handled differently on the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Statement? Once again, did the
Village Attorney fill out the Attorney Confirmation completely, honestly and
accurately?
A Million Dollar judgment or
settlement with either of these Plaintiffs does, in my opinion (and any
sensible universe,) have a materially adverse effect on the financial position
of the Village. Is the Village once
again not being open and honest? Did the
Village Staff, specifically the Village Manager or Village Attorney, mislead
the auditors or is it just incompetence?
Regardless of the reason, the
record needs to be set straight and if needed the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report corrected. I call upon the Mayor
and Council to investigate as these are their Financial Statements. In the mean time it’s important that the
Council set up a Board of Financial Advisors to keep this from happening
again. Our Village, without a doubt,
could call to service any number of financially seasoned resident-professionals
to assist with the Financials and help the Village weave through numbers and guidelines
to get the budget and reporting finally in order.David Singer
No comments:
Post a Comment